São Paulo Demonstrations: It’s Not About 20 Cents, Stupid!

(Editor’s Note: The following is a guest post by Raphael Neves, PhD candidate at the Politics department at the New School for Social Research, and assistant professor of politics at the University of São Paulo)

São Paulo, the largest city in the Southern hemisphere and Brazil’s financial center, is located thousands of miles away from Istanbul but its 11.3 million inhabitants still know what it feels like to be in Taksim Square. This month, both bus and subway fares
increased by 20 cents of real – the equivalent of 9 cents, USD. Protesters took to the streets following the raise, leading to several clashes with the police. Authorities
claim the increase was below the inflation rate (6.50% in the last 12 months). The mayor, Fernando Haddad, a philosophy professor and the former minister of education under Lula, had stated during his election campaign last year that the city would have to raise the already subsidized fares, frozen since 2011. Brazil has received some of the best combined democracy, economic growth and income distribution scores among the BRICS. So why are people complaining? face_protest The demonstrations have been organized by the Free Fare Movement, which promotes free public transportation for all (a demand the mayor says would cost almost 3 billion USD/year). As the event page of one of the protests on Facebook shows, the demands range from the decrease in public transportation fares to better salaries for teachers; from increased freedom on the Internet, to objections of the construction of soccer stadiums for the next World Cup. Furthermore, the São Paulo state police, commanded by governor Geraldo Alckmin, has overreacted and stepped out of the law. Countless people were arrested for bringing vinegar to the demonstrations. According to police officers, vinegar may be used to produce a bomb. In fact, demonstrators say, it alleviates the effects of tear gas. As a result, protesters have embraced a campaign to “legalize” vinegar. They’ve made Guy Fawkes masks their symbol and “V for Vinegar” has become an immediate hit on social networks. Mockery and creativity are central in these protests as
they’ve helped keep people mobilized. Even when they are forced to split up by the police, they keep connected online.

As the construction of a shopping mall at Taksim square became the last straw for protesters in Turkey, in Brazil, the 20 cents increase has catalyzed dissatisfaction. The perplexed may wonder whether ten years of Workers’ Party rule – Lula’s first term inauguration was in 2003, Dilma, his successor, in 2011 – have contributed to
fight inequality. The answer is yes. However, and here we may have a sharp distinction between Turkey and Brazil, the protests are not directed only towards the government. They are much more dispersed and fragmented. On the one hand, a large part of the population has been integrated into the economic market and consumption levels have never been so high. On the other hand, this possibly made people more aware of other problems way beyond material needs. A minimum wage worker may now choose which cell phone or TV she or he is going to buy, but one is unable to have dominion over basic
aspects of everyday life. In São Paulo, where rent is as expensive as in New York, someone who lives in a poorer area will spend at least two hours in an extremely crowded bus or train to get to work. To lose control over one’s own time and space is enough reason to revolt, isn’t it?

"São Paulo will shut down if the fare doesn't go down!"

“São Paulo will shut down if the fare doesn’t go down!”

All in all, the political system has not been capable of processing this generalized and
fragmented dissatisfaction. The increasing scale of the demonstrations is probably due to their rejection of any sort of party commitment. Of course, the risk of such detachment between civil society and political institutions is to give even more autonomy to bureaucratic structures that administer Brazilians’ lives. In this sense, mobilization may lead to political change, although the result is not necessarily more “progressive” – think,
for instance, of Indignados in Spain, a movement that demanded a radical change of the political system but was followed by the election of Mariano Rajoy. The challenge Brazil
faces is to make democracy more visible; to go beyond the right to cast a ballot in order to empower citizens to exercise effective control over all realms of their lives. These 20 cents are worth a change.
Raphael on twitter: @politikaetc


6 thoughts on “São Paulo Demonstrations: It’s Not About 20 Cents, Stupid!

  1. Como vocês são maldosos com o brasil, não estamos reivindicando nossos direitos somente pelos 20 centavos, mas sim pela educação que não temos, pela saúde que não temos, pela segurança que não temos… infelizmente no brasil temos muita corrupção dos deputados e governantes. o brasil está acordando e vamos correr atrás de nossos direitos e vamos conseguir

  2. Let me see: The tone used in this ‘beautiful’ entry fails to unfold the whole truth about the protests and also ignores the hard reality brazilians have to face every single day, not to mention: almost PAY to go to their job places. Infrastructure in that country does not exist, period. Governors, presidents, all sort of politicians claim that ‘we don’t have the money’, but brazilian people work 5 months altogether just for paying the high taxes that are spread all over any commodity you can imagine. Obviously the country needs its taxes, but the large portion of the main taxes applied in basic products – not to say fundamental ones, daily necessary ones – have overly 45% of tax embeddded on it! Some say that’s necessary, but for what? People don’t have that ‘investiment’ returned in any way expected. Worst education ever in the world, inflation higher and higher, laughable wages that are below U$400 while politicians steal the money to be used on building a better nation! Come on! This text is as lame as the excuse given by Haddad: a fucking patronizing to all of the brazilian people!

  3. Dear Denis, if I mentioned PEC 37 I would have to spend at least one paragraph explaining how the Prosecution office works in Brazil (btw, “public ministry” makes no sense at all). This would change my focus completely.

    Caro Felipe, acho que você não leu o que escrevi aí. Nem se deu o trabalho de ler o título do post.

    Dear Joseph, I’m glad your comment enlightened us about the “whole truth.” Thank you very much.


  4. Pingback: Weekly Links | Political Violence @ a Glance

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s